Maricopa County Elections Director Reynaldo Valenzuela testified at Republican Kari Lake's election challenge trial Wednesday that mail-in ballot reviews were done at election officials' homes in 2020 with no observers present.

Valenzuela also confirmed officials still have the ability to do so now.

Lake is contesting Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs' win last November by approximately 17,000 votes, or 0.7 percent of the more than 2.5 million ballots cast statewide.

In March, the Arizona Supreme Court remanded the issue of whether the mail-in ballot legally mandated signature verification process was followed in Maricopa County during the election back to the trial court.

Lake attorney Byran Blehm questioned Valenzuela regarding the places where mail-in ballot verification took place in November and whether independent observers were present.

Valenzuela said there were three locations where mail-in verification took place: Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center, known as MCTEC in downtown Phoenix; the Maricopa County Recorder's office, also in Phoenix; and Maricopa County's Southeast Regional Center in Mesa.

Whistleblower Jacqueline Onigkeit, who worked as a ballot reviewer at MCTEC in November, had testified before Valenzuela that she thought it was "odd" when she and her fellow reviewers were sent home at 7 p.m. as counting continued of mail-in ballots.

“Why did you think it was odd?” Lake attorney Kurt Olsen asked.

“Well, because we had observers that were constantly watching what we were doing [at the designated vote-counting area]. But there was, I’m assuming, no observers there [at the recorder’s office] who was watching what they were doing," she replied.

🚨 Huge 🚨

Whistleblower testifies normal level 1
signature verifiers were sent home early and the signature review function was then performed at the County Recorder's Office.

With no observers. pic.twitter.com/nHd2GalaCC

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) May 17, 2023

In light of this testimony, Blehm questioned Valenzuela whether observers are allowed in the county recorder's office or at the Mesa location.

Valenzuela responded that observers are allowed in "any general area," but it's not a legal requirement.

He went on to explain that as a "certified election officer" he and others can do signature verification in their offices with no observers present.

Blehm followed up asking, "Can signature verification be done at a Maricopa County employee’s home?"

Valenzuela answered saying, "We don’t have that currently in place," but during 2020 with the pandemic ongoing, the county allowed reviewers to work from home.

There is confirmation at the very end of this clip that Maricopa County allowed signature verification to be performed remotely (from home) during the 2020 election.

Interesting.

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) May 18, 2023

Blehm continued with this line of questioning Thursday asking Valenzuela, "Is it physically possible [now] for Maricopa County employees to log in and conduct signature verification from home?"

The elections director responded, "An employee can log in and access their PC as if they were sitting in front of that PC remote, that are assigned those work stations," but indicating that is not protocol.

🚨

Maricopa County elections director confirms that County employees have the ability to "perform" signature verification remotely (as in from home) absent of any observers. pic.twitter.com/1g0OBSnHKy

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) May 18, 2023

Approximately 80 percent of Arizonans vote using mail-in ballots, according to the Citizens Clean Elections Commission.

Lake's attorney Kurt Olsen has argued that the process for verifying voters in Maricopa County is systemically flawed.

On Wednesday, he told that court that a review of data from the county showed at least 334,000 mail-in ballots were in effect not verified, which is far in excess of Hobbs' 17,000 vote margin of victory.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.