It is clear that corruption has managed to seep into the foundation of our government over the years. President Trump is also aware of this issue and has been fighting to weed out all of the “Deep State” leftovers from Obama, as well as all corruption in the political system.
Hillary Clinton is known for her shady behavior with email servers–lately, more than anything else. During the “investigation” into Clinton that was supposed to take place last year, things began to fall apart. Former FBI Director James Comey was caught up trying to lie about the investigation. He had announced in July that an investigation was not necessary, but evidence shows he came to the decision as early as April — a three-month difference. This factor alone draws renewed attention to the Clinton investigation–a may warrant reopening the case.
When Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Charles Grassley (R-IA), were able to demonstrate that Comey had decided Clinton’s innocence back in April, this caused people to scratch their heads. He had made his decision before the FBI interviewed 16 witnesses — including Clinton herself.
Comey could not possibly decide whether or not Clinton was guilty of a crime when he had not spoken to her–at least not on an official level. He knew well in advance that he was going to pardon the former failed presidential candidate and Secretary of State.
Oddly enough, Democrats or most mainstream media outlets fail to bring this story up, but see no problem talking about Russia for an entire news cycle. It is clear that they are fighting for one side of the political spectrum, and not as fair as one might like to think.
This shows a level of corruption deeper than anything previously imagined. The email scandal is just the tip of the Clinton iceberg.
Michael Goodwin of the New York Post called the investigation “a total sham” and noted, “When the outcome is decided long before the investigation is over, the result can’t be trusted.” He’s right. A decision made before hearing all of the evidence certainly isn’t one based on objectivity.
There is no logical reason for Comey to be talking about how he was going to let Clinton off the hook–unless he already made his decision before hearing the testimonies. If that is the case, the investigation needs a special counsel to ensure fairness.
President Trump took to Twitter on Sept 1 to express his outrage over the events. Hopefully, this signals an investigation to come.
The tweet by the President states, “Wow, looks like James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton long before the investigation was over…and so much more. A rigged system!”
There are evident signs of a rigged system. A second investigation would open up doors to putting Clinton in prison–a place where many conservatives believes she belongs.
Looks like Comey made a “decision” about Hillary well before investigation. Looks rigged. Do you think Comey rigged Hillary’s exoneration?
An investigation into Comey’s incompetence would also open doors into investigations of the Obama administration as well. At the time of this writing, two dozen House Republicans have demanded a special counsel investigation of Clinton and her crimes.
As more information is revealed, more House members are expected to come forward to request a new counsel and investigation into Clinton, and Comey’s connection to the ordeal. There is certainly more here than meets the eye.