A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump granted a preliminary injunction to block the Biden administration from imposing burdensome environmental regulations that would cause “irreparable harm” to the economies of Texas and Idaho and intrude on their sovereignty.
At issue is the “Waters of the United States” rule announced in late December by the Environmental Protection Agency. It substantially expands federal jurisdiction over water sources across the nation, including local lakes, ponds and streams.
These waters are typically under state control, but Biden’s EPA wants the federal government to regulate all of them. The WOTUS rule was to take effect on Monday.
In granting an injunction Sunday, Judge Jeffrey Brown of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas said the rule exceeds the EPA’s authority.
The judge also agreed with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton — who sued the EPA on behalf of Texas and was joined by Idaho — that complying with the rule would cause “irreparable harm” to the states.
Brown declined to grant a nationwide injunction, noting that 25 other states have also filed lawsuits challenging the WOTUS rule.
Paxton said in a statement Monday that the injunction was a crucial step in curbing “destructive federal overreach.”
“While I continue to battle the rule in court, this preliminary injunction is a major blow to the Biden Administration’s radical environmental agenda,” the state attorney general said.
[firefly_poll]
“The unlawful rule would have saddled Texans across the state with crushing new regulations, slowing our state’s economic development and limiting our job growth … This is an important victory protecting the people of Texas from destructive federal overreach.”
Paxton also touted his success in a tweet that slammed the WOTUS rule as “radical” and blasted President Joe Biden’s “leftist environmental agenda.”
“I will always fight to keep Biden’s boots off the necks of Texans!” he said Monday.
Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador also rebuked what he called “massive federal overreach” on the part of the Biden administration.
“The Biden WOTUS rules would subject Idaho citizens to massive federal overreach on their own land and hamper Idaho job creators, creating a barrier for Idaho’s farmers, ranchers, and small businesses that depend on access to their land and Idaho resources,” Labrador said in a statement Monday.
He said allowing the rule to take effect would subject Idaho landowners to excessive federal bureaucracy that would result in expensive compliance costs.
The issue here isn’t water. Most Americans want clean water and support measures to ensure public access to it.
But the WOTUS rule spotlights once again that Democrats constantly advocate measures that expand Big Government overreach — whether it’s compulsory mask-wearing, vaccine mandates, forced racial diversity in schools and businesses or federalization of the murders of unborn children.
Ironically, Democrats frivolously accuse Republicans of being “fascist” and “authoritarian” while simultaneously trying to usurp state sovereignty and personal autonomy.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
Biden Admin’s Agenda Dealt Major Blow by Federal Judge: ‘Destructive Federal Overreach’
A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump granted a preliminary injunction to block the Biden administration from imposing burdensome environmental regulations that would cause “irreparable harm” to the economies of Texas and Idaho and intrude on their sovereignty.
At issue is the “Waters of the United States” rule announced in late December by the Environmental Protection Agency. It substantially expands federal jurisdiction over water sources across the nation, including local lakes, ponds and streams.
These waters are typically under state control, but Biden’s EPA wants the federal government to regulate all of them. The WOTUS rule was to take effect on Monday.
In granting an injunction Sunday, Judge Jeffrey Brown of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas said the rule exceeds the EPA’s authority.
The judge also agreed with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton — who sued the EPA on behalf of Texas and was joined by Idaho — that complying with the rule would cause “irreparable harm” to the states.
Brown declined to grant a nationwide injunction, noting that 25 other states have also filed lawsuits challenging the WOTUS rule.
Paxton said in a statement Monday that the injunction was a crucial step in curbing “destructive federal overreach.”
“While I continue to battle the rule in court, this preliminary injunction is a major blow to the Biden Administration’s radical environmental agenda,” the state attorney general said.
[firefly_poll]
“The unlawful rule would have saddled Texans across the state with crushing new regulations, slowing our state’s economic development and limiting our job growth … This is an important victory protecting the people of Texas from destructive federal overreach.”
Paxton also touted his success in a tweet that slammed the WOTUS rule as “radical” and blasted President Joe Biden’s “leftist environmental agenda.”
“I will always fight to keep Biden’s boots off the necks of Texans!” he said Monday.
Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador also rebuked what he called “massive federal overreach” on the part of the Biden administration.
“The Biden WOTUS rules would subject Idaho citizens to massive federal overreach on their own land and hamper Idaho job creators, creating a barrier for Idaho’s farmers, ranchers, and small businesses that depend on access to their land and Idaho resources,” Labrador said in a statement Monday.
He said allowing the rule to take effect would subject Idaho landowners to excessive federal bureaucracy that would result in expensive compliance costs.
The issue here isn’t water. Most Americans want clean water and support measures to ensure public access to it.
But the WOTUS rule spotlights once again that Democrats constantly advocate measures that expand Big Government overreach — whether it’s compulsory mask-wearing, vaccine mandates, forced racial diversity in schools and businesses or federalization of the murders of unborn children.
Ironically, Democrats frivolously accuse Republicans of being “fascist” and “authoritarian” while simultaneously trying to usurp state sovereignty and personal autonomy.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
Trending Now
Dairy Queen Angers Fans as It Discontinues Famous Item Before Summer: ‘Year Ruined’
Woman Informed She’s Won the Most Bizarre Race Ever After Waking Up in Medical Tent
National Archives Refusing to Release Certain Emails Between Joe and Hunter Biden, Cites Exemption Under Law
Christian Actor Mark Wahlberg to Create ‘Hollywood 2.0’, Announces Location of New Studio
Grocery Chain Trader Joe’s Responds to ‘Conspiratorial Theories’ About Its Stores’ Parking Lots
Fire Destroys Historic US Church – When Smoke Clears, a Sign of Hope Is Seen
Oxford Is Creating an ‘African American Dictionary,’ and the First 10 Words Were Just Announced
Newly Released Jan. 6 Footage Exposes What Pelosi Did While Leaving the Capitol
Hollywood Actor Admits He Summoned Satan During Filming and Paid the Price for It
Capitol Police Interrupt Children’s Choir Singing National Anthem: ‘It Might Offend’
Claims of ‘Racial Profiling’ After Chicago Walgreens Removes All but Two Aisles from Customers’ View